Convert Quant to Polygon Price Calculator & qnt vs. matic Comparison

With the ever-fluctuating cryptocurrency market, keeping track of real-time prices between Quant and Polygon can be challenging. Our dedicated Quant to Polygon price converter & calculator makes this task seamless and straightforward. Whether you're an investor, trader, or crypto enthusiast, leverage our tool to get the latest conversion rates of qnt vs. matic. Stay ahead of the market and make informed decisions by accessing the most up-to-date data at your fingertips

1 Quant (qnt) == 123.27259386083 Polygon (matic).
Rate : 123.27259386083

Quant (qnt) Price: 100.8$
Polygon (matic) Price: 0.8177$

How much is 1 Quant in Polygon

1 Quant is 123.27259386083 Polygon.

Quant (QNT) vs Polygon (MATIC): A Comparative Review


As a pro blockchain engineer, it is essential to analyze and compare different cryptocurrencies to understand their capabilities and potential. In this article, we will review and compare Quant (QNT) and Polygon (MATIC) to gain insights into their features and application areas.

Quant (QNT)

Quant is a London-based company aiming to revolutionize blockchain technology through their blockchain operating system called Overledger. The team is focused on creating an open trusted network for secure and safe operations of people, machines, and data. Overledger is the first interoperable blockchain operating system that enables the development of decentralized multi-chain applications at an internet scale. It ensures connectivity to different blockchains, eliminating limitations with vendor or technology dependency.

Polygon (MATIC)

Polygon, previously known as Matic Network, provides a well-structured and user-friendly platform for Ethereum scaling and infrastructure development. It offers Polygon SDK, a flexible framework supporting various types of application development, including Optimistic Rollup chains, ZK Rollup chains, and standalone chains. By transforming Ethereum into a full-fledged multi-chain system, Polygon combines the security and openness of Ethereum with the capabilities of other multi-chain systems such as Polkadot and Cosmos.

MATIC tokens play a crucial role in securing the system and enabling governance, further enhancing the ecosystem.

Comparative Analysis

Use Cases

Quant focuses on creating an open trusted network for secure operations of people, machines, and data. It aims to facilitate the development of decentralized multi-chain applications, providing connectivity to different blockchains.

Polygon primarily aims to address scalability issues of Ethereum by transforming it into a multi-chain system. It provides infrastructure for building various types of applications, including stand-alone chains and Optimistic Rollup chains.

Market Positioning

While Quant occupies the 34th rank in terms of market capitalization, Polygon stands at the 13th position. This indicates Polygon's significant growth and market acceptance. However, market capitalization alone should not be the sole factor when evaluating these platforms.

Price Performance

Quant has shown a positive price change percentage of +34% in the past 30 days, highlighting its growth potential. In contrast, Polygon witnessed a price decrease of -22.14% during the same period. It is essential to consider market volatility and long-term trends before making investment decisions.

Ecosystem and Categories

Quant focuses on the Ethereum ecosystem and positions itself as a protocol within the ecosystem. Polygon, on the other hand, has a wider presence, with categories including Binance Launchpad, Alleged SEC Securities, Smart Contract Platform, and more. This suggests Polygon's efforts to establish connections with various ecosystems and develop a versatile platform.


Both Quant (QNT) and Polygon (MATIC) offer unique features and aim to address different aspects of blockchain technology. While Quant seeks to create an open trusted network for secure and scalable operations, Polygon focuses on solving Ethereum's scalability issues through its multi-chain system infrastructure. Investors and developers should carefully evaluate their requirements and assess the potential benefits and limitations of each platform before making informed decisions.